1962 Holden EK vs. 2010 Subaru Forester
To start off, 2010 Subaru Forester is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Holden EK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Holden EK would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Subaru Forester is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Subaru Forester (145 HP) has 81 more horse power than 1962 Holden EK. (64 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Subaru Forester should accelerate faster than 1962 Holden EK.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Subaru Forester (350 Nm) has 186 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Holden EK. (164 Nm). This means 2010 Subaru Forester will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Holden EK.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Holden EK | 2010 Subaru Forester | |
Make | Holden | Subaru |
Model | EK | Forester |
Year Released | 1962 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2260 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
Horse Power | 64 HP | 145 HP |
Torque | 164 Nm | 350 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |