1962 Jeep CJ5 vs. 2011 Chevrolet Orlando
To start off, 2011 Chevrolet Orlando is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Jeep CJ5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Jeep CJ5 would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1962 Jeep CJ5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Chevrolet Orlando (128 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 69 more horse power than 1962 Jeep CJ5. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Chevrolet Orlando should accelerate faster than 1962 Jeep CJ5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Chevrolet Orlando weights approximately 635 kg more than 1962 Jeep CJ5. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Chevrolet Orlando (315 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 170 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Jeep CJ5. (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2011 Chevrolet Orlando will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Jeep CJ5.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Jeep CJ5 | 2011 Chevrolet Orlando | |
Make | Jeep | Chevrolet |
Model | CJ5 | Orlando |
Year Released | 1962 | 2011 |
Body Type | SUV | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2199 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 128 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 145 Nm | 315 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 1665 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3520 mm | 4652 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1836 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1633 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2760 mm |