1962 Lotus Elite vs. 2010 Honda Jazz
To start off, 2010 Honda Jazz is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Lotus Elite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Lotus Elite would be higher. At 1,497 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Honda Jazz is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Honda Jazz (118 HP) has 35 more horse power than 1962 Lotus Elite. (83 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Honda Jazz should accelerate faster than 1962 Lotus Elite.
Because 1962 Lotus Elite is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Lotus Elite. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Honda Jazz, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Honda Jazz (145 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 43 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Lotus Elite. (102 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 2010 Honda Jazz will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Lotus Elite.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Lotus Elite | 2010 Honda Jazz | |
Make | Lotus | Honda |
Model | Elite | Jazz |
Year Released | 1962 | 2010 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1215 cc | 1497 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 83 HP | 118 HP |
Torque | 102 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3710 mm | 3910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1190 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2510 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 29 L | 42 L |