1962 Mazda R 360 vs. 2000 Skoda Fabia
To start off, 2000 Skoda Fabia is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Mazda R 360. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Mazda R 360 would be higher. At 1,388 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Skoda Fabia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Skoda Fabia (99 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 83 more horse power than 1962 Mazda R 360. (16 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Skoda Fabia should accelerate faster than 1962 Mazda R 360. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Skoda Fabia weights approximately 690 kg more than 1962 Mazda R 360. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Skoda Fabia (126 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 104 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Mazda R 360. (22 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2000 Skoda Fabia will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Mazda R 360.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Mazda R 360 | 2000 Skoda Fabia | |
Make | Mazda | Skoda |
Model | R 360 | Fabia |
Year Released | 1962 | 2000 |
Engine Size | 355 cc | 1388 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 16 HP | 99 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 22 Nm | 126 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 60 mm | 76.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 63 mm | 75.6 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 380 kg | 1070 kg |
Vehicle Length | 2990 mm | 3970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1300 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 1770 mm | 2470 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 45 L |