1962 Mazda R 360 vs. 2004 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2004 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Mazda R 360. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Mazda R 360 would be higher. At 1,198 cc (3 cylinders), 2004 Volkswagen Polo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Volkswagen Polo (60 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 1962 Mazda R 360. (16 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Volkswagen Polo should accelerate faster than 1962 Mazda R 360. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Volkswagen Polo weights approximately 705 kg more than 1962 Mazda R 360. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Volkswagen Polo (113 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 91 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Mazda R 360. (22 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2004 Volkswagen Polo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Mazda R 360.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Mazda R 360 | 2004 Volkswagen Polo | |
| Make | Mazda | Volkswagen |
| Model | R 360 | Polo |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
| Engine Size | 355 cc | 1198 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 16 HP | 60 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Torque | 22 Nm | 113 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 60 mm | 76.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 63 mm | 86.9 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 380 kg | 1085 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 2990 mm | 3900 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1300 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1770 mm | 2510 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 45 L |
