1962 Mazda R 360 vs. 2013 Cadillac SRX
To start off, 2013 Cadillac SRX is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Mazda R 360. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Mazda R 360 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac SRX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac SRX (304 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 288 more horse power than 1962 Mazda R 360. (16 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac SRX should accelerate faster than 1962 Mazda R 360. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac SRX weights approximately 2100 kg more than 1962 Mazda R 360. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Cadillac SRX (359 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 337 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Mazda R 360. (22 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2013 Cadillac SRX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Mazda R 360.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Mazda R 360 | 2013 Cadillac SRX | |
Make | Mazda | Cadillac |
Model | R 360 | SRX |
Year Released | 1962 | 2013 |
Body Type | Coupe | Crossover |
Engine Size | 355 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 16 HP | 304 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 6800 RPM |
Torque | 22 Nm | 359 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 60 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 63 mm | 86 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 380 kg | 2480 kg |
Vehicle Length | 2990 mm | 4834 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1300 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1669 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 1770 mm | 2807 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 80 L |