1962 Renault 8 vs. 2005 Toyota Camry
To start off, 2005 Toyota Camry is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Renault 8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Renault 8 would be higher. At 3,297 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Toyota Camry is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Toyota Camry (223 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 176 more horse power than 1962 Renault 8. (47 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Toyota Camry should accelerate faster than 1962 Renault 8. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Toyota Camry weights approximately 760 kg more than 1962 Renault 8. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 Renault 8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Renault 8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Toyota Camry, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Renault 8 | 2005 Toyota Camry | |
| Make | Renault | Toyota |
| Model | 8 | Camry |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 956 cc | 3297 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 47 HP | 223 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 740 kg | 1500 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4900 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1820 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2280 mm | 2730 mm |
