1962 Renault 8 vs. 2006 Toyota Camry
To start off, 2006 Toyota Camry is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Renault 8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Renault 8 would be higher. At 2,999 cc, 2006 Toyota Camry is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Toyota Camry (190 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 143 more horse power than 1962 Renault 8. (47 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Toyota Camry should accelerate faster than 1962 Renault 8. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Toyota Camry weights approximately 615 kg more than 1962 Renault 8. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 Renault 8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Renault 8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Toyota Camry, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Renault 8 | 2006 Toyota Camry | |
| Make | Renault | Toyota |
| Model | 8 | Camry |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 956 cc | 2999 cc |
| Horse Power | 47 HP | 190 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 740 kg | 1355 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4810 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1800 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2280 mm | 2730 mm |
