1962 Volvo 220 vs. 2005 SsangYong Actyon
To start off, 2005 SsangYong Actyon is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Volvo 220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Volvo 220 would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 SsangYong Actyon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 SsangYong Actyon (148 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 74 more horse power than 1962 Volvo 220. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 SsangYong Actyon should accelerate faster than 1962 Volvo 220. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 SsangYong Actyon weights approximately 757 kg more than 1962 Volvo 220. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 SsangYong Actyon (214 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 70 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Volvo 220. (144 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 2005 SsangYong Actyon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Volvo 220.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Volvo 220 | 2005 SsangYong Actyon | |
Make | Volvo | SsangYong |
Model | 220 | Actyon |
Year Released | 1962 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1778 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 144 Nm | 214 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2300 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1772 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1890 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2750 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 75 L |