1962 Zastava 750 vs. 2011 Audi R8
To start off, 2011 Audi R8 is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Zastava 750. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Zastava 750 would be higher. At 4,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Audi R8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Audi R8 (420 HP @ 7800 RPM) has 396 more horse power than 1962 Zastava 750. (24 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Audi R8 should accelerate faster than 1962 Zastava 750.
Because 2011 Audi R8 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Zastava 750. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Audi R8 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Audi R8 (430 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 384 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Zastava 750. (46 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2011 Audi R8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Zastava 750.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Zastava 750 | 2011 Audi R8 | |
| Make | Zastava | Audi |
| Model | 750 | R8 |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2011 |
| Engine Size | 766 cc | 4200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 24 HP | 420 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 7800 RPM |
| Torque | 46 Nm | 430 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 3300 mm | 4435 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1390 mm | 1905 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1245 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2649 mm |
