1962 Zastava 750 vs. 2013 Jeep Compass

To start off, 2013 Jeep Compass is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Zastava 750. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Zastava 750 would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Jeep Compass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Jeep Compass (170 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 146 more horse power than 1962 Zastava 750. (24 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Jeep Compass should accelerate faster than 1962 Zastava 750. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Jeep Compass weights approximately 915 kg more than 1962 Zastava 750. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2013 Jeep Compass is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Zastava 750. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Jeep Compass will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Jeep Compass (224 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 178 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Zastava 750. (46 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2013 Jeep Compass will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Zastava 750.

Compare all specifications: