1963 Abarth Mono 1000 vs. 2004 Ford C-MAX

To start off, 2004 Ford C-MAX is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Abarth Mono 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Abarth Mono 1000 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Ford C-MAX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford C-MAX (153 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 94 more horse power than 1963 Abarth Mono 1000. (59 HP @ 6600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford C-MAX should accelerate faster than 1963 Abarth Mono 1000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford C-MAX weights approximately 862 kg more than 1963 Abarth Mono 1000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1963 Abarth Mono 1000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Abarth Mono 1000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Ford C-MAX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford C-MAX (197 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 107 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Abarth Mono 1000. (90 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2004 Ford C-MAX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Abarth Mono 1000.

Compare all specifications:

1963 Abarth Mono 1000 2004 Ford C-MAX
Make Abarth Ford
Model Mono 1000 C-MAX
Year Released 1963 2004
Engine Position Rear Front
Engine Size 981 cc 1998 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 59 HP 153 HP
Engine RPM 6600 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 90 Nm 197 Nm
Torque RPM 3200 RPM 4500 RPM
Engine Bore Size 65 mm 87.5 mm
Engine Stroke Size 74 mm 83.1 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.8:1 10.8:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 2 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 560 kg 1422 kg
Vehicle Length 3490 mm 4340 mm
Vehicle Width 1420 mm 1830 mm
Vehicle Height 1180 mm 1600 mm
Wheelbase Size 2010 mm 2650 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 59 L 59 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]