1963 AC Cobra vs. 2010 Peugeot 3008
To start off, 2010 Peugeot 3008 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 AC Cobra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 AC Cobra would be higher. At 4,727 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 AC Cobra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 AC Cobra (271 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 117 more horse power than 2010 Peugeot 3008. (154 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 AC Cobra should accelerate faster than 2010 Peugeot 3008.
Because 2010 Peugeot 3008 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 AC Cobra. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Peugeot 3008 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 AC Cobra (423 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 183 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Peugeot 3008. (240 Nm @ 1400 RPM). This means 1963 AC Cobra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Peugeot 3008.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 AC Cobra | 2010 Peugeot 3008 | |
| Make | AC | Peugeot |
| Model | Cobra | 3008 |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Roadster | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4727 cc | 1598 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 271 HP | 154 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Torque | 423 Nm | 240 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 1400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Top Speed | 217 km/hour | 201 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3850 mm | 4365 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1837 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1639 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2613 mm |
