1963 AC Greyhound vs. 2008 Fiat Bravo
To start off, 2008 Fiat Bravo is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 1,971 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 AC Greyhound is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Fiat Bravo weights approximately 335 kg more than 1963 AC Greyhound.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Fiat Bravo (206 Nm) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 AC Greyhound. (179 Nm). This means 2008 Fiat Bravo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 AC Greyhound.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 AC Greyhound | 2008 Fiat Bravo | |
| Make | AC | Fiat |
| Model | Greyhound | Bravo |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 1368 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 179 Nm | 206 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1350 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4340 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1800 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1500 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2610 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 58 L |
