1963 AC Greyhound vs. 2010 Chevrolet Malibu
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Chevrolet Malibu (169 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 46 more horse power than 1963 AC Greyhound. (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet Malibu should accelerate faster than 1963 AC Greyhound. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Chevrolet Malibu weights approximately 544 kg more than 1963 AC Greyhound. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Chevrolet Malibu (217 Nm) has 38 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 AC Greyhound. (179 Nm). This means 2010 Chevrolet Malibu will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 AC Greyhound.
Compare all specifications:
1963 AC Greyhound | 2010 Chevrolet Malibu | |
Make | AC | Chevrolet |
Model | Greyhound | Malibu |
Year Released | 1963 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 169 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 217 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1559 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4872 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1786 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2852 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 61 L |