1963 AC Greyhound vs. 2011 Audi TT
To start off, 2011 Audi TT is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 AC Greyhound. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 AC Greyhound would be higher. At 1,971 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 AC Greyhound is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Audi TT (168 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 1963 AC Greyhound. (123 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1963 AC Greyhound.
Let's talk about torque, 2011 Audi TT (350 Nm) has 171 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 AC Greyhound. (179 Nm). This means 2011 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 AC Greyhound.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 AC Greyhound | 2011 Audi TT | |
| Make | AC | Audi |
| Model | Greyhound | TT |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 1964 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 168 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Torque | 179 Nm | 350 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4201 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1842 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1359 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2469 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 60 L |
