1963 Cadillac 62 vs. 1975 Toyota Corona
To start off, 1975 Toyota Corona is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 113 more horse power than 1975 Toyota Corona. (84 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1975 Toyota Corona. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1090 kg more than 1975 Toyota Corona. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Cadillac 62 | 1975 Toyota Corona | |
Make | Cadillac | Toyota |
Model | 62 | Corona |
Year Released | 1963 | 1975 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6390 cc | 1587 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 84 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 81 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 98.4 mm | 77 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2090 kg | 1000 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4260 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2510 mm |