1963 Cadillac 62 vs. 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 764 kg more than 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Cadillac 62 | 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
| Make | Cadillac | Oldsmobile |
| Model | 62 | Cutlass |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1981 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6390 cc | 2568 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2090 kg | 1326 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4850 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1770 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2680 mm |
