1963 Cadillac 62 vs. 2000 Lotus Extreme
To start off, 2000 Lotus Extreme is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 77 more horse power than 2000 Lotus Extreme. (120 HP @ 7800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2000 Lotus Extreme. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1634 kg more than 2000 Lotus Extreme. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Cadillac 62 | 2000 Lotus Extreme | |
Make | Cadillac | Lotus |
Model | 62 | Extreme |
Year Released | 1963 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6390 cc | 700 cc |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 120 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 7800 RPM |
Vehicle Weight | 2090 kg | 456 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 3510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2420 mm |