1963 Cadillac 62 vs. 2005 Mercedes-Benz R
To start off, 2005 Mercedes-Benz R is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mercedes-Benz R (221 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 1963 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mercedes-Benz R should accelerate faster than 1963 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mercedes-Benz R weights approximately 180 kg more than 1963 Cadillac 62. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Cadillac 62 | 2005 Mercedes-Benz R | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | 62 | R |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6390 cc | 2987 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 221 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 83 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 98.4 mm | 92 mm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2090 kg | 2270 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 5160 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1930 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1660 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 3220 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 80 L |
