1963 Cadillac 62 vs. 2007 Volvo C70
To start off, 2007 Volvo C70 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 2007 Volvo C70. (161 HP @ 5100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2007 Volvo C70. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 432 kg more than 2007 Volvo C70. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Cadillac 62 | 2007 Volvo C70 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Volvo |
| Model | 62 | C70 |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2007 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6390 cc | 1984 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 161 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5100 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 81.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 98.4 mm | 77 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2090 kg | 1658 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4720 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2670 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 68 L |
