1963 Cadillac 62 vs. 2009 Chevrolet Impala
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Impala is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet Impala (211 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 1963 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Impala should accelerate faster than 1963 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 541 kg more than 2009 Chevrolet Impala.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Cadillac 62 | 2009 Chevrolet Impala | |
| Make | Cadillac | Chevrolet |
| Model | 62 | Impala |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6390 cc | 3500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 211 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2090 kg | 1549 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 5100 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1860 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1500 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2810 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 64 L |
