1963 Cadillac 62 vs. 2009 Nissan Note
To start off, 2009 Nissan Note is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Cadillac 62 (197 HP) has 108 more horse power than 2009 Nissan Note. (89 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2009 Nissan Note. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1038 kg more than 2009 Nissan Note. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Cadillac 62 | 2009 Nissan Note | |
| Make | Cadillac | Nissan |
| Model | 62 | Note |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6390 cc | 1386 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 89 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2090 kg | 1052 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4083 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1691 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1550 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2600 mm |
