1963 Cadillac 62 vs. 2010 Holden UTE
To start off, 2010 Holden UTE is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden UTE (242 HP) has 45 more horse power than 1963 Cadillac 62. (197 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1963 Cadillac 62.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Cadillac 62 | 2010 Holden UTE | |
| Make | Cadillac | Holden |
| Model | 62 | UTE |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6390 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 242 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
