1963 Citroen Ak 350 vs. 2010 Jeep Patriot
To start off, 2010 Jeep Patriot is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Citroen Ak 350. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Citroen Ak 350 would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Jeep Patriot is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Jeep Patriot (172 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 150 more horse power than 1963 Citroen Ak 350. (22 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Jeep Patriot should accelerate faster than 1963 Citroen Ak 350. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Jeep Patriot weights approximately 832 kg more than 1963 Citroen Ak 350. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Jeep Patriot (223 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 182 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Citroen Ak 350. (41 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2010 Jeep Patriot will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Citroen Ak 350.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Citroen Ak 350 | 2010 Jeep Patriot | |
Make | Citroen | Jeep |
Model | Ak 350 | Patriot |
Year Released | 1963 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 602 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 22 HP | 172 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 41 Nm | 223 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 605 kg | 1437 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3610 mm | 4409 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1755 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1669 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2634 mm |