1963 DKW F 11 vs. 2013 Volvo C30
To start off, 2013 Volvo C30 is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW F 11. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW F 11 would be higher. At 2,500 cc (5 cylinders), 2013 Volvo C30 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Volvo C30 (224 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 186 more horse power than 1963 DKW F 11. (38 HP @ 4300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Volvo C30 should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW F 11. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Volvo C30 weights approximately 710 kg more than 1963 DKW F 11. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 DKW F 11 | 2013 Volvo C30 | |
Make | DKW | Volvo |
Model | F 11 | C30 |
Year Released | 1963 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 889 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 5 valves |
Horse Power | 38 HP | 224 HP |
Engine RPM | 4300 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque RPM | 2250 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 750 kg | 1460 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 4266 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 2039 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1447 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2640 mm |