1963 DKW Munga vs. 1964 Ford Falcon
To start off, 1964 Ford Falcon is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW Munga would be higher. At 2,890 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Ford Falcon (282 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 239 more horse power than 1963 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 DKW Munga weights approximately 410 kg more than 1964 Ford Falcon.
Because 1963 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Ford Falcon. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 DKW Munga | 1964 Ford Falcon | |
Make | DKW | Ford |
Model | Munga | Falcon |
Year Released | 1963 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 980 cc | 2890 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 282 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 20.2:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 700 kg |