1963 DKW Munga vs. 1974 Mercury Comet
To start off, 1974 Mercury Comet is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW Munga would be higher. At 3,272 cc (6 cylinders), 1974 Mercury Comet is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1974 Mercury Comet (83 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 1963 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1974 Mercury Comet should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1974 Mercury Comet weights approximately 110 kg more than 1963 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1974 Mercury Comet. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 DKW Munga | 1974 Mercury Comet | |
| Make | DKW | Mercury |
| Model | Munga | Comet |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1974 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 980 cc | 3272 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 83 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 1800 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 76.1 mm | 93.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 74 mm | 79.5 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1220 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4620 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1800 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2630 mm |
