1963 DKW Munga vs. 1996 Honda CRX
To start off, 1996 Honda CRX is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW Munga would be higher. At 1,590 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Honda CRX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Honda CRX (131 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 88 more horse power than 1963 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Honda CRX should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 DKW Munga weights approximately 60 kg more than 1996 Honda CRX.
Because 1963 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Honda CRX. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 DKW Munga | 1996 Honda CRX | |
| Make | DKW | Honda |
| Model | Munga | CRX |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 980 cc | 1590 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 131 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 76.1 mm | 75 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 74 mm | 90 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1050 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4010 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1260 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2380 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 45 L |
