1963 DKW Munga vs. 2006 Mazda 3
To start off, 2006 Mazda 3 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW Munga would be higher. At 1,596 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda 3 (105 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 62 more horse power than 1963 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Mazda 3 weights approximately 75 kg more than 1963 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Mazda 3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 DKW Munga | 2006 Mazda 3 | |
Make | DKW | Mazda |
Model | Munga | 3 |
Year Released | 1963 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 980 cc | 1596 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 105 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76.1 mm | 78 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 74 mm | 83.6 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1185 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2650 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 55 L |