1963 DKW Munga vs. 2010 Cadillac Escalade
To start off, 2010 Cadillac Escalade is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW Munga would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Cadillac Escalade is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Cadillac Escalade (403 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 360 more horse power than 1963 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac Escalade should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Cadillac Escalade weights approximately 1397 kg more than 1963 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Cadillac Escalade. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 DKW Munga | 2010 Cadillac Escalade | |
| Make | DKW | Cadillac |
| Model | Munga | Escalade |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 980 cc | 6200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 403 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5700 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4300 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 2507 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 5144 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 2007 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1928 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2946 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 98 L |
