1963 Ford Cortina vs. 1951 Jeep CJ3A
To start off, 1963 Ford Cortina is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Jeep CJ3A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Jeep CJ3A would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1951 Jeep CJ3A is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1951 Jeep CJ3A (59 HP) has 10 more horse power than 1963 Ford Cortina. (49 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1951 Jeep CJ3A should accelerate faster than 1963 Ford Cortina.
Because 1951 Jeep CJ3A is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Ford Cortina. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1951 Jeep CJ3A will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1951 Jeep CJ3A (145 Nm) has 55 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Ford Cortina. (90 Nm). This means 1951 Jeep CJ3A will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Ford Cortina.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Ford Cortina | 1951 Jeep CJ3A | |
Make | Ford | Jeep |
Model | Cortina | CJ3A |
Year Released | 1963 | 1951 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1198 cc | 2199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 59 HP |
Torque | 90 Nm | 145 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 3130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1460 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2040 mm |