1963 Ford Taunus vs. 2005 Lincoln LS
To start off, 2005 Lincoln LS is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Ford Taunus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Ford Taunus would be higher. At 2,967 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Lincoln LS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Lincoln LS (229 HP @ 6750 RPM) has 191 more horse power than 1963 Ford Taunus. (38 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Lincoln LS should accelerate faster than 1963 Ford Taunus. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Lincoln LS weights approximately 842 kg more than 1963 Ford Taunus. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Ford Taunus | 2005 Lincoln LS | |
Make | Ford | Lincoln |
Model | Taunus | LS |
Year Released | 1963 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1183 cc | 2967 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 38 HP | 229 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6750 RPM |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 80.1 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 58.9 mm | 80 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 845 kg | 1687 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 4930 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 3030 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 68 L |