1963 Holden EJ vs. 1970 Monteverdi 2000
To start off, 1970 Monteverdi 2000 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Holden EJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Holden EJ would be higher. At 2,262 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Holden EJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 Monteverdi 2000 (129 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 65 more horse power than 1963 Holden EJ. (64 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1970 Monteverdi 2000 should accelerate faster than 1963 Holden EJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1970 Monteverdi 2000 weights approximately 156 kg more than 1963 Holden EJ. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Holden EJ | 1970 Monteverdi 2000 | |
Make | Holden | Monteverdi |
Model | EJ | 2000 |
Year Released | 1963 | 1970 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2262 cc | 1996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 64 HP | 129 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1134 kg | 1290 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1260 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2560 mm |