1963 Holden EJ vs. 1976 Mazda 929
To start off, 1976 Mazda 929 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Holden EJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Holden EJ would be higher. At 2,262 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Holden EJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Mazda 929 (83 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 1963 Holden EJ. (64 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1976 Mazda 929 should accelerate faster than 1963 Holden EJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Holden EJ weights approximately 60 kg more than 1976 Mazda 929.
Let's talk about torque, 1963 Holden EJ (163 Nm @ 1400 RPM) has 29 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Mazda 929. (134 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1963 Holden EJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Mazda 929.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Holden EJ | 1976 Mazda 929 | |
Make | Holden | Mazda |
Model | EJ | 929 |
Year Released | 1963 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2262 cc | 1769 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 64 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 163 Nm | 134 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1134 kg | 1074 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2520 mm |