1963 Holden EJ vs. 1976 Mazda 929

To start off, 1976 Mazda 929 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Holden EJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Holden EJ would be higher. At 2,262 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Holden EJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Mazda 929 (83 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 1963 Holden EJ. (64 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1976 Mazda 929 should accelerate faster than 1963 Holden EJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Holden EJ weights approximately 60 kg more than 1976 Mazda 929.

Let's talk about torque, 1963 Holden EJ (163 Nm @ 1400 RPM) has 29 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Mazda 929. (134 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1963 Holden EJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Mazda 929.

Compare all specifications:

1963 Holden EJ 1976 Mazda 929
Make Holden Mazda
Model EJ 929
Year Released 1963 1976
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2262 cc 1769 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 64 HP 83 HP
Engine RPM 4200 RPM 5000 RPM
Torque 163 Nm 134 Nm
Torque RPM 1400 RPM 3000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Vehicle Weight 1134 kg 1074 kg
Vehicle Length 4500 mm 4410 mm
Vehicle Width 1740 mm 1670 mm
Vehicle Height 1480 mm 1420 mm
Wheelbase Size 2680 mm 2520 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]