1963 Holden EJ vs. 1978 Volvo 66
To start off, 1978 Volvo 66 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Holden EJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Holden EJ would be higher. At 2,262 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Holden EJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Holden EJ (64 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 1978 Volvo 66. (56 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Holden EJ should accelerate faster than 1978 Volvo 66. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Holden EJ weights approximately 304 kg more than 1978 Volvo 66. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Holden EJ (163 Nm) has 69 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Volvo 66. (94 Nm). This means 1963 Holden EJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Volvo 66.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Holden EJ | 1978 Volvo 66 | |
| Make | Holden | Volvo |
| Model | EJ | 66 |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1978 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2262 cc | 1289 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 64 HP | 56 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 163 Nm | 94 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1134 kg | 830 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 3910 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1390 mm |
