1963 Holden EJ vs. 1982 Ford Laser
To start off, 1982 Ford Laser is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Holden EJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Holden EJ would be higher. At 2,262 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Holden EJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Ford Laser (85 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 1963 Holden EJ. (64 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Ford Laser should accelerate faster than 1963 Holden EJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Holden EJ weights approximately 344 kg more than 1982 Ford Laser.
Because 1963 Holden EJ is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Holden EJ. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Ford Laser, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Holden EJ (163 Nm @ 1400 RPM) has 43 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Ford Laser. (120 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1963 Holden EJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Ford Laser.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Holden EJ | 1982 Ford Laser | |
Make | Holden | Ford |
Model | EJ | Laser |
Year Released | 1963 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2262 cc | 1489 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 64 HP | 85 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 163 Nm | 120 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1400 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1134 kg | 790 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 3960 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2370 mm |