1963 Holden EJ vs. 1985 Nissan Cedric

To start off, 1985 Nissan Cedric is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Holden EJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Holden EJ would be higher. At 2,262 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Holden EJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1985 Nissan Cedric (102 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 1963 Holden EJ. (64 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1985 Nissan Cedric should accelerate faster than 1963 Holden EJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1985 Nissan Cedric weights approximately 141 kg more than 1963 Holden EJ. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1985 Nissan Cedric (168 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Holden EJ. (163 Nm @ 1400 RPM). This means 1985 Nissan Cedric will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Holden EJ.

Compare all specifications:

1963 Holden EJ 1985 Nissan Cedric
Make Holden Nissan
Model EJ Cedric
Year Released 1963 1985
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2262 cc 1973 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 64 HP 102 HP
Engine RPM 4200 RPM 5600 RPM
Torque 163 Nm 168 Nm
Torque RPM 1400 RPM 3600 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Vehicle Weight 1134 kg 1275 kg
Vehicle Length 4500 mm 4790 mm
Vehicle Width 1740 mm 1710 mm
Vehicle Height 1480 mm 1440 mm
Wheelbase Size 2680 mm 2740 mm