1963 Holden EJ vs. 1999 Chevrolet Blazer
To start off, 1999 Chevrolet Blazer is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Holden EJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Holden EJ would be higher. At 4,293 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Chevrolet Blazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Chevrolet Blazer (187 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 123 more horse power than 1963 Holden EJ. (64 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Chevrolet Blazer should accelerate faster than 1963 Holden EJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Chevrolet Blazer weights approximately 781 kg more than 1963 Holden EJ. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1999 Chevrolet Blazer (338 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 175 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Holden EJ. (163 Nm @ 1400 RPM). This means 1999 Chevrolet Blazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Holden EJ.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Holden EJ | 1999 Chevrolet Blazer | |
| Make | Holden | Chevrolet |
| Model | EJ | Blazer |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2262 cc | 4293 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 64 HP | 187 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Torque | 163 Nm | 338 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1400 RPM | 2800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1134 kg | 1915 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4640 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1710 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2730 mm |
