1963 Holden EJ vs. 2000 Toyota Altezza
To start off, 2000 Toyota Altezza is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Holden EJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Holden EJ would be higher. At 2,262 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Holden EJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Toyota Altezza (74 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 1963 Holden EJ. (64 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Altezza should accelerate faster than 1963 Holden EJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Toyota Altezza weights approximately 480 kg more than 1963 Holden EJ. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Toyota Altezza is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Holden EJ. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Altezza will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Toyota Altezza (610 Nm) has 447 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Holden EJ. (163 Nm). This means 2000 Toyota Altezza will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Holden EJ.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Holden EJ | 2000 Toyota Altezza | |
| Make | Holden | Toyota |
| Model | EJ | Altezza |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2262 cc | 1975 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 64 HP | 74 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Torque | 163 Nm | 610 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1134 kg | 1614 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2710 mm |
