1963 Holden EJ vs. 2003 Holden Rodeo
To start off, 2003 Holden Rodeo is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Holden EJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Holden EJ would be higher. At 3,494 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Holden Rodeo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Holden Rodeo (145 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 81 more horse power than 1963 Holden EJ. (64 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Holden Rodeo should accelerate faster than 1963 Holden EJ.
Because 2003 Holden Rodeo is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Holden EJ. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Holden Rodeo will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Holden Rodeo (280 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 117 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Holden EJ. (163 Nm @ 1400 RPM). This means 2003 Holden Rodeo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Holden EJ.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Holden EJ | 2003 Holden Rodeo | |
Make | Holden | Holden |
Model | EJ | Rodeo |
Year Released | 1963 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2262 cc | 3494 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 64 HP | 145 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 163 Nm | 280 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 3060 mm |