1963 Holden EJ vs. 2005 Skoda Octavia

To start off, 2005 Skoda Octavia is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Holden EJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Holden EJ would be higher. At 2,262 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Holden EJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Skoda Octavia (113 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 1963 Holden EJ. (64 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Skoda Octavia should accelerate faster than 1963 Holden EJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Skoda Octavia weights approximately 191 kg more than 1963 Holden EJ. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1963 Holden EJ is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Holden EJ. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Skoda Octavia, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Skoda Octavia (172 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 9 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Holden EJ. (163 Nm @ 1400 RPM). This means 2005 Skoda Octavia will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Holden EJ.

Compare all specifications: