1963 Holden EJ vs. 2009 Porsche Cayenne
To start off, 2009 Porsche Cayenne is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Holden EJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Holden EJ would be higher. At 3,597 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Porsche Cayenne is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Porsche Cayenne (286 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 222 more horse power than 1963 Holden EJ. (64 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Porsche Cayenne should accelerate faster than 1963 Holden EJ.
Because 2009 Porsche Cayenne is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Holden EJ. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Porsche Cayenne will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Porsche Cayenne (385 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 222 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Holden EJ. (163 Nm @ 1400 RPM). This means 2009 Porsche Cayenne will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Holden EJ.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Holden EJ | 2009 Porsche Cayenne | |
Make | Holden | Porsche |
Model | EJ | Cayenne |
Year Released | 1963 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2262 cc | 3597 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 64 HP | 286 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 163 Nm | 385 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1930 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2860 mm |