1963 Holden EJ vs. 2013 Chevrolet Camaro

To start off, 2013 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Holden EJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Holden EJ would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Chevrolet Camaro (319 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 255 more horse power than 1963 Holden EJ. (64 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1963 Holden EJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 676 kg more than 1963 Holden EJ. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Chevrolet Camaro (377 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 214 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Holden EJ. (163 Nm @ 1400 RPM). This means 2013 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Holden EJ.

Compare all specifications:

1963 Holden EJ 2013 Chevrolet Camaro
Make Holden Chevrolet
Model EJ Camaro
Year Released 1963 2013
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2262 cc 3600 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 64 HP 319 HP
Engine RPM 4200 RPM 6800 RPM
Torque 163 Nm 377 Nm
Torque RPM 1400 RPM 4800 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Vehicle Weight 1134 kg 1810 kg
Vehicle Length 4500 mm 4836 mm
Vehicle Width 1740 mm 1918 mm
Vehicle Height 1480 mm 1377 mm
Wheelbase Size 2680 mm 2852 mm