1963 Jaguar MK II vs. 1967 Opel Record
To start off, 1967 Opel Record is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Jaguar MK II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Jaguar MK II would be higher. At 2,511 cc (4 cylinders), 1967 Opel Record is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Jaguar MK II (120 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1967 Opel Record. (90 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Jaguar MK II should accelerate faster than 1967 Opel Record.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Jaguar MK II (195 Nm) has 43 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Opel Record. (152 Nm). This means 1963 Jaguar MK II will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Opel Record.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Jaguar MK II | 1967 Opel Record | |
Make | Jaguar | Opel |
Model | MK II | Record |
Year Released | 1963 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2482 cc | 2511 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 90 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 195 Nm | 152 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 8.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5000 mm | 4580 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1600 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2670 mm |