1963 Jeep CJ5 vs. 1950 Maserati A6G
To start off, 1963 Jeep CJ5 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Maserati A6G. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Maserati A6G would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Jeep CJ5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1950 Maserati A6G (64 HP @ 4700 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 1963 Jeep CJ5. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1950 Maserati A6G should accelerate faster than 1963 Jeep CJ5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Jeep CJ5 weights approximately 156 kg more than 1950 Maserati A6G.
Because 1963 Jeep CJ5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1950 Maserati A6G. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 Jeep CJ5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Jeep CJ5 | 1950 Maserati A6G | |
| Make | Jeep | Maserati |
| Model | CJ5 | A6G |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1950 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2199 cc | 1488 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 64 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4700 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1032 kg | 876 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2560 mm |
