1963 Jeep CJ5 vs. 2008 Mazda 3

To start off, 2008 Mazda 3 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Jeep CJ5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Jeep CJ5 would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Jeep CJ5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Mazda 3 (104 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 1963 Jeep CJ5. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1963 Jeep CJ5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Mazda 3 weights approximately 228 kg more than 1963 Jeep CJ5. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1963 Jeep CJ5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Mazda 3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 Jeep CJ5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 145 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.

Compare all specifications:

1963 Jeep CJ5 2008 Mazda 3
Make Jeep Mazda
Model CJ5 3
Year Released 1963 2008
Body Type SUV Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2199 cc 1594 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 59 HP 104 HP
Engine RPM 3600 RPM 5500 RPM
Torque 145 Nm 145 Nm
Torque RPM 3600 RPM 4000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline - Premium
Drive Type 4WD Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Weight 1032 kg 1260 kg
Vehicle Length 3520 mm 4430 mm
Vehicle Width 1550 mm 1760 mm
Vehicle Height 1740 mm 1470 mm
Wheelbase Size 2060 mm 2650 mm