1963 Lincoln Continental vs. 2009 Holden Epica
To start off, 2009 Holden Epica is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lincoln Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lincoln Continental would be higher. At 7,048 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Lincoln Continental (284 HP) has 136 more horse power than 2009 Holden Epica. (148 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Lincoln Continental should accelerate faster than 2009 Holden Epica.
Because 1963 Lincoln Continental is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Lincoln Continental. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Holden Epica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Lincoln Continental | 2009 Holden Epica | |
Make | Lincoln | Holden |
Model | Continental | Epica |
Year Released | 1963 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7048 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 284 HP | 148 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5500 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2700 mm |