1963 Lotus 25 vs. 1968 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 1968 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lotus 25. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lotus 25 would be higher. Both 1963 Lotus 25 and 1968 Mitsubishi Colt are equipped with a 1,498 cc engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Lotus 25 (196 HP @ 9500 RPM) has 124 more horse power than 1968 Mitsubishi Colt. (72 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Lotus 25 should accelerate faster than 1968 Mitsubishi Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Mitsubishi Colt weights approximately 454 kg more than 1963 Lotus 25.
Because 1963 Lotus 25 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Lotus 25. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1968 Mitsubishi Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Lotus 25 | 1968 Mitsubishi Colt | |
| Make | Lotus | Mitsubishi |
| Model | 25 | Colt |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1968 |
| Engine Size | 1498 cc | 1498 cc |
| Horse Power | 196 HP | 72 HP |
| Engine RPM | 9500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 456 kg | 910 kg |
