1963 Lotus Seven vs. 1986 Plymouth Sundance
To start off, 1986 Plymouth Sundance is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lotus Seven. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lotus Seven would be higher. At 2,211 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Plymouth Sundance is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Plymouth Sundance (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 58 more horse power than 1963 Lotus Seven. (38 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1986 Plymouth Sundance should accelerate faster than 1963 Lotus Seven. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Plymouth Sundance weights approximately 745 kg more than 1963 Lotus Seven. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 Lotus Seven is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Lotus Seven. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Plymouth Sundance, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Lotus Seven | 1986 Plymouth Sundance | |
Make | Lotus | Plymouth |
Model | Seven | Sundance |
Year Released | 1963 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 997 cc | 2211 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 38 HP | 96 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 430 kg | 1175 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3360 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2470 mm |